Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 19:47
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 132
59% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 324
36% 282 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 110
Parallax 89.6
82% 100 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 99.7
80% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 229 210 204 196 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 404
Write 374
Mixed 332
SusWrite 224
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 36.9
117% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 256
192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 158
Write 159
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 112
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$21
134GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.5
Write 83.7
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 82.9
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 996GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 77 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 73
Write 72.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 73.4
45% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 107%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 249GB
204GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 29
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 28
39% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C11D3/4GX XM1D3LF4GB26826821 KHX2133C11D3/4GX XM1D3LF4GB26826821 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback