Lenovo 20C5A02KME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20C5A02KME  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C5A02KME
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 17:16
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 176
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 443
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS420S 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 98 41 36 30 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 444
Write 301
Mixed 342
SusWrite 76.5
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 16.3
82% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 32.5
79% 160 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
310GB free
Firmware: AX0G1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 95.4
Write 31.2
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 32.7
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20C5A02KME Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C5A02KME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback