Gmktec NucBox4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemGmktec NucBox4  (all builds)
MotherboardGMKTEC GMKTEC
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220301
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 19:21
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 499
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 15.9
9% 12 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 8.8
7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NS512GSSD530 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0806A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1366 1552 1514 1665 1687 1698 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 1,566
Mixed 1,159
SusWrite 1,580
349% 1557 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 27.1
182% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 529
460% 688 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 260%
Great: 276%
JAJS600M2TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 408 408 421 425 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 467
Write 424
Mixed 372
SusWrite 413
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 28.1
117% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 47.1
71% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-16GB-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NucBox4 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Gmktec NucBox4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback