Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Memory 3.56 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 100 27% 56.2 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 156 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5062) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 5.1 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 0.3 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 512GB 572 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: RY25V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 221 125 303 188 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 310 Write 298 Mixed 258 SusWrite 181 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 6.3 30% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 15.1 46% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-16GB-2666 1x16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 468 8% 468 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	2x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2x

SSD
MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 84%, 1,835 samples	1x
S800 512GBRamstaBench 71%, 572 samples	1x

RAM
SKIHOTAR-16GB-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 36%, 23 samples	1x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 38%, 15,437 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16