PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150624 |
Uptime | 7.6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '22 at 19:18 |
Run Duration | 257 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0782) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 321 284 255 322 289 MB/s
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 274 274 276 275 273 MB/s
|
93.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32
352GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 46 69 68 66 68 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Station 2TB
512GB free, PID 60f3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 158 158 154 151 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk uSD SDDR-289 64GB
55GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
12GB free, PID 0245
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4 MB/s
|
4.08%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 143x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 28x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $490 |