Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 152 58% 101 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 208 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 881A) 2GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.73% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 9.3 7% 9.6 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.2 7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 121 55 22 72 59 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.3% Average	Read 222 Write 200 Mixed 209 SusWrite 89.4 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 17.2 63% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 45.9 76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	31.2% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	6x
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	1x
FirePro W5100 (FireGL V)AMDBench 16%, 561 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	6x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GBCE80CE80Bench 31%, 9 samples	5x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBCE80CE80Bench 24%, 100 samples	2x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $97