Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	9.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 757 75% 611 Pts	64-Core 989 61% 989 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1391) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.24% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 73.4 Parallax 8 6% 29.4 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 10.8 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.24% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB 27,018 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 808 799 845 883 329 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,106 Write 784 Mixed 793 SusWrite 742 192% 856 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 60 202% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 645 DQ Mixed 221 244% 400 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 203%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB 2,512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 172GB free Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 426 292 244 252 251 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 356 Write 355 Mixed 331 SusWrite 315 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 34.2 108% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 312 233% 311 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 23.2 84% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 25.6 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	734x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	636x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	578x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	200x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16