Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B17
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) (all builds)
Memory	20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$442 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 77.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 278 89% 165 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 903 87% 715 Pts	64-Core 1,364 84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Lighting 200 Reflection 179 Parallax 172 163% 184 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 139 Splatting 121 119% 150 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 210 11 72 59 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 469 Write 307 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 91.4 48% 221 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.7 30% 8.6 MB/s	DQ Read 73.2 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 0.7 28% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 523GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 172 177 171 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 69.2 Write 127 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 163 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 106%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 25GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 39 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 89.7 Write 27.1 Mixed 41 SusWrite 24.4 52% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.3 197% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 4x8GB 1,280 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 24.4 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 21.6 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,418x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,029x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	852x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	853x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	646x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	556x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	617x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	445x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	417x

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $829

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16