Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel® Core™i7-6300U 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.2% Below average	Memory 38.1 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 75.3 30% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 138 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5064) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.9 2% 1.63 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.56% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Valuetech Basics SSD 256GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227I SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 215 258 230 256 269 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 359 Write 246 Mixed 244 SusWrite 236 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 7.2 49% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 15.9 43% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core™i7-6300UIntel®Bench 32%, 2 samples	2x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	1x
Celeron N3450 1.1GHzIntelBench 34%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 157 samples	2x
Basics SSD 256GBValuetechBench 61%, 50 samples	1x
SD8SN8U128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 70%, 1,303 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16