TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HCB
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 07:06
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 316
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 921
92% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 88.6%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 13FC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 71.7
33% 50.6 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 61
53% 65 fps
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 39.4%
 Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 1390 1439 1441 1360 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,254
Write 1,463
Mixed 1,185
SusWrite 1,246
342% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 92
311% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 411
316% 429 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑
This bench: 283%
 Great: 297%
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS1000G 1TB
336GB free
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1286 688 117 280 120 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,526
Write 1292
Mixed 957
SusWrite 432
235% 1052 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 24.7
148% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 514
412% 593 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 159%
 Great: 267%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 1TB
567GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 327 361 365 364 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 125
Write 358
Mixed 313
SusWrite 350
66% 286 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 18.4
69% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 35.9
58% 112 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 54.1%
 Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 17.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 76.9%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB Builds (Compare 3,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples2,767x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples295x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples230x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples1,772x
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 5,186 samples672x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples670x
SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples1,875x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples746x
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples276x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 6,335 samples759x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples536x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples532x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback