Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 62.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 529
59% 462 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.8.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 18.2
11% 14.8 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 11.6
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 5.8 2.1 5.9 173 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 460
Write 331
Mixed 275
SusWrite 73.9
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 11.3
41% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 51.2
DQ Mixed 31.8
37% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
696GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 114 118 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 79.1
Write 112
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 110
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback