Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 09:49
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 30.3
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 149
44% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 394
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.2
4% 6 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 2.1 5.2 5.2 5.5 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 440
Write 279
Mixed 290
SusWrite 61.1
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 13.4
51% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 42.5
46% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
319GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 107 102 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 73.4
Write 90.7
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 98.4
65% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
179% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback