Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 172 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 328 44% 329 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 3.9 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW210715 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 202 190 200 201 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.4% Average	Read 216 Write 196 Mixed 183 SusWrite 198 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 9.4 75% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 11.3 21% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 813GB free Firmware: JU002E SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 135 137 133 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 133 Write 106 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 135 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	744x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	182x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	159x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	98x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	55x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,270 samples	40x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278