Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 11:20
Run Duration415 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 655
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
MSI(1462 8E90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3801 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 137
Parallax 137
123% 142 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 109
Splatting 106
97% 121 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 479 333 213 223 221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 477
Mixed 388
SusWrite 324
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 43.4
152% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 186
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 133%
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
46GB free
Firmware: 41000C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2375
Write 1,568
Mixed 1,659
414% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 62.8
216% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 608
446% 591 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 313%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
27GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 44 39 40 43 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 230
Write 60
Mixed 81
SusWrite 42.2
22% 103 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 10.5
47% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 13.4
12% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 56%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
11GB free
Firmware: 040H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 270
Mixed 260
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 15.6
97% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 22.8
68% 143 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
2GB free
Firmware: 000F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 261
Write 235
Mixed 206
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 14.4
74% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 22.8
60% 127 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
43GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 238 238 235 238 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 244
Write 233
Mixed 187
SusWrite 237
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 14.1
85% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 83.7
88% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 86%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
34GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 198 235 235 235 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.7% Above average
Read 254
Write 233
Mixed 228
SusWrite 223
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 23.4
87% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 50.3
74% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 81%
3 480GB SSD 480GB
109GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 198 197 198 197 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 389
Write 332
Mixed 310
SusWrite 198
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 27.3
125% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 41.2
73% 140 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 101%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
112GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 218 219 218 218 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 392
Write 359
Mixed 354
SusWrite 218
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 46.3
154% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 146
111% 151 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 129%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
125GB free
Firmware: HKF03M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 91 91 92 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 78
Write 87.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 91.2
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.2
166% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 64%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
35GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 58.8
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 59%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MB 500GB
135GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 48.7
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 76.6
79% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 43%
M4-CT256 M4SSD2 256GB
54GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.9% Below average
Read 32.3
Write 29
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 29.4
41% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 6.9
529% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML32GX3M4A1600C1 CML32GX3M4A1600C1 CML32GX3M4A1600C1 CML32GX3M4A1600C1 CMP32GX3M4X1600C1 CMP32GX3M4X1600C1 CMP32GX3M4X1600C1 CMP32GX3M4X1600C1 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 36.3
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback