Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7600QE_M7600QE

Performance Results

Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 53%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7600QE_M7600QE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M7600QE
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220309
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 16:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 109
47% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 374
34% 287 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 18EC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 12.8
7% 28.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 10.9
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 297 285 273 261 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 1,030
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 305
193% 863 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 37.4
124% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 386
283% 372 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7600QE_M7600QE Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 21%
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 20%

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7600QE_M7600QE

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback