Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 04:54
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 701
77% 608 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3555 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 177
Parallax 178
141% 176 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 135
Splatting 131
123% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 257 273 276 277 277 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 485
Mixed 450
SusWrite 255
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 45.2
142% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 129%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 250 265 266 266 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 509
Write 450
Mixed 417
SusWrite 247
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 23.7
119% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 36.8
87% 175 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
931GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 364 400 403 404 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 381
Mixed 390
SusWrite 371
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.6
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 712
451% 509 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 125%
Great: 299%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$96
184GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 267 288 288 289 289 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 486
Mixed 465
SusWrite 267
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 62.3
204% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 117%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 194 194 195 195 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 83.9
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 188
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 25.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback