Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 09:29
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 259
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 681
73% 581 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3554 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 182
Parallax 199
146% 186 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 154
Splatting 132
128% 161 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,558
Write 7748
Mixed 7,911
1,802% 8,072 MB/s
4K Read 704
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 349
1,646% 434 MB/s
DQ Read 1,488
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 942
763% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
885GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 383 383 382 385 383 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 510
Write 451
Mixed 417
SusWrite 385
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 23.9
118% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 36.3
83% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89%
Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
929GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 406 406 406 406 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 400
Mixed 388
SusWrite 406
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.1
218% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 708
449% 508 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 126%
Great: 299%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$96
234GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 417 416 416 416 416 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 486
Mixed 461
SusWrite 417
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.8
206% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 164 165 165 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 153
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 163
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26.7
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback