Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 09:04
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 708
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3555 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 179
Parallax 202
149% 188 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 159
Splatting 135
130% 163 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 252 274 276 276 276 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 483
Mixed 458
SusWrite 253
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 55.5
187% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 247 263 266 265 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 490
Write 446
Mixed 414
SusWrite 246
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 24.5
113% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 36.1
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79%
Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
931GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 359 398 402 402 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 357
Mixed 390
SusWrite 368
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 65.2
219% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 712
451% 509 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 124%
Great: 299%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$96
209GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 263 285 287 287 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 482
Mixed 466
SusWrite 264
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 62.3
204% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 116%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 191 193 195 195 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 82.6
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 186
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 25.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback