HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150713
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '22 at 14:58
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 198 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 372 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20.01H20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 108 98 63 50 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 78.3 Write 63.2 Mixed 47.1 SusWrite 75 48% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HD200HJ 200GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 184GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 38 37 37 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.3% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 22.9 Mixed 28 SusWrite 37.7 39% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 17%
TOSHIBA HDWD240 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1.5TB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 102 98 103 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50% Above average	Read 182 Write 189 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 99.7 182% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 68%
ST320005 42AS 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 530GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 102 98 103 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 75.6 Write 53.1 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 101 96% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA MK5056GSY 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 97GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 33 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 26.1 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 33.5 38% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 16%
SAMSUNG HM160JC 160GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 149GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22 Write 17.4 Mixed 18.1 24% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 17.8 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 19.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	1,272x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	1,133x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	302x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	2,251x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	403x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	316x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	233x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	93x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	86x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	70x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	62x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16