HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 87.5
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 96.7
62% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 93.6
8-Core 98.3
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 95.4
6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 435
MSI(1462 3400) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 23.20.768.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.9
4% 6.83 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 7.9
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1713
Write 646
Mixed 569
212% 976 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 67.4
227% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 572
457% 647 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
1GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.2
Write 94.7
Mixed 20.6
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback