Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 168
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 282
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.4
7% 8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 414
Mixed 24.8
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 12.4
69% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 1.1
70% 163 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
SMI2263XT 512GB
359GB free
Firmware: T0918A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1290 1414 1459 593 270 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
187% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 1,501
Mixed 982
SusWrite 872
270% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 25.8
165% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 452
390% 578 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 187%
Great: 187%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
323GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 98 98 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 90.7
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 97.3
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback