Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 06:14
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 155
2-Core 314
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 953
97% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 29.3
18% 23.6 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 21.2
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 396 362 401 406 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 417
Mixed 357
SusWrite 386
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 43.1
140% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
209GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 270 270 272 271 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 434
Write 400
Mixed 354
SusWrite 283
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 40
138% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 159
131% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 118%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
179GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 259 262 261 259 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 460
Write 358
Mixed 271
SusWrite 262
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 33.9
124% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 175
139% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
72GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 260 263 264 267 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 410
Mixed 271
SusWrite 267
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 35.8
125% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 197
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 259 259 255 258 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 400
Write 332
Mixed 315
SusWrite 263
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 29.9
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 197
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
209GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 85 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 88.5
Write 94.7
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 84.3
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
661GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 67 67 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 65
Write 70.3
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 65.5
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
711GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 103 103 104 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 68
SusWrite 102
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 67%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 5.6 7.2 6 3.3 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 3.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.3
7% 6.53 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 29.3
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback