CMS 7200-5643A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCMS 7200-5643A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 04:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 686
72% 574 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 98
57% 77.6 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 48.4
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128-HP 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 174 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 174
Mixed 233
SusWrite 174
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 46.6
170% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 172
146% 218 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 20.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5643A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: CMS 7200-5643A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback