CMS 7200-5643A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCMS 7200-5643A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 04:22
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 83
2-Core 244
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 719
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 88.3
53% 71.6 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 46.2
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128-HP 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 176 175 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 174
Mixed 235
SusWrite 174
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.4
169% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 171
146% 217 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 20.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 16.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5643A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: CMS 7200-5643A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback