CMS 7200-5643A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemCMS 7200-5643A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 04:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 722
75% 604 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 89.5
54% 72.9 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 46.4
49% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128-HP 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 174 169 173 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 174
Mixed 234
SusWrite 173
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 46.9
170% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 172
146% 218 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5643A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: CMS 7200-5643A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback