Asus N55SL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus N55SL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N55SL
Memory0.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 15:55
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 75
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 367
41% 323 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 635M
Asus(1043 212B) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8
Parallax 5.6
4% 6.37 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 247 78 135 117 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 450
Write 383
Mixed 371
SusWrite 164
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 13.3
72% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 0.4
66% 153 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N55SL Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback