Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 681
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 19.3
15% 19 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 17.6
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 377 376 383 379 374 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 368
Mixed 280
SusWrite 377
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 35.4
129% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 314
240% 324 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 104%
ACASIS 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 39 0 33 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 322
Write 268
Mixed 276
SusWrite 46.6
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 21.8
84% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.1
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 99.7
78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
246GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 98 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 88.9
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 95.6
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 69%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 85
Write 83.4
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 85.8
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
547GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 82.7
Write 83.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 82.1
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 57%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
195GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 77 76 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 70.4
Write 44
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 75.4
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 50%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
148GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 25.5
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 26.4
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 31.2
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback