Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus E3M-ET V5 SERIES  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 97
2-Core 180
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 353
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 64.4
55% 67.1 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 64.2
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 759 989 404 395 398 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,253
Write 1,262
Mixed 1184
SusWrite 557
239% 1064 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 66.9
245% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 668
607% 943 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 207%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3M-ET V5 SERIES Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback