Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 131 2-Core 245 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 754 74% 609 Pts	64-Core 1,108 68% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2762 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 30 Parallax 30 24% 30 fps	MRender 30 Gravity 30 Splatting 30 25% 30 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 48 64 70 63 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44% Average	Read 428 Write 64.8 Mixed 24 SusWrite 62.3 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 12.7 56% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 89 DQ Mixed 105 86% 126 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 121%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 45GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 84 131 144 129 134 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 158 Write 160 Mixed 104 SusWrite 126 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 101%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 76 108 116 106 107 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 132 Write 75.2 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 103 73% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	938x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	875x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	778x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	458x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	445x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	346x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	483x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	400x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	339x

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $778

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16