HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 183E
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 15:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 104
54% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 163
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 183E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 297 296 295 295 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 422
Write 438
Mixed 378
SusWrite 310
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 34.1
111% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 358
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 124%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 25 22 22 25 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 106
Write 40
Mixed 9
SusWrite 21.9
46% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
45% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback