Intel NUC7i7BNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel(R) NUC7i7BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i7BNB  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220125
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 15:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7567U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 274
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1518 1359 1193 1221 1119 1340 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,173
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,142
SusWrite 1,292
292% 1,290 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 74.5
243% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 599
454% 618 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 230%
Great: 365%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
434GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 302 285 288 252 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 353
Mixed 292
SusWrite 293
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 37.3
145% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 257
220% 324 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5624-001.A00G 9905624-007.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 22.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 86%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i7BNB Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i7BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback