Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '22 at 10:40
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 143 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 401 40% 324 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1391) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 104 Parallax 7.7 4% 39.1 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 0.3 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 702GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42G1TBKA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1267 1007 663 593 564 739 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Read 577 Write 585 Mixed 242 SusWrite 806 125% 553 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 6.7 30% 8.93 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 508 352% 448 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 372%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 133 133 134 131 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 99.9 Write 95.7 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 131 69% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Kingston 9905624-046.A00G 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.7 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 22.4 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	734x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	482x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	636x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	579x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $235Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	200x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16