Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$281
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 64.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 275
77% 148 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 963
86% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,472
91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 208
Parallax 200
183% 211 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 158
Splatting 128
126% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 337 357 378 393 389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 416
Write 145
Mixed 306
SusWrite 369
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 273
220% 310 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 119%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
222GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 323 340 359 371 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 427
Mixed 381
SusWrite 351
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 15.9
95% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 24.6
84% 181 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 92%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEDMW800G4 800GB
578GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 847 860 875 874 879 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 965
Write 887
Mixed 657
SusWrite 867
190% 844 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 43.9
175% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 793
597% 802 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 180%
Great: 185%
Nvme PNY CS2130 2TB SSD
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213522 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 196 486 260 382 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 980
Write 1,324
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 484
217% 960 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 59.3
192% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 784
590% 793 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 164%
Great: 365%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
214GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 325 343 363 147 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 485
Write 440
Mixed 399
SusWrite 294
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 1.5
59% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 1.2
63% 147 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 19.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback