Asus P7Q57-M DO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7Q57-M DO  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110511
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 399
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 88.6
53% 72.7 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 47.2
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 112 68 64 61 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 228
Write 115
Mixed 158
SusWrite 101
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 25
92% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 28.4
24% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 90%
SSD 120GB 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: V0111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 141 55 55 65 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 252
Write 230
Mixed 232
SusWrite 102
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 20.7
106% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 93.9
DQ Mixed 25.2
31% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7Q57-M DO Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7Q57-M DO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback