Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EA
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 03:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 260
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 639
73% 570 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1432) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 29.3
20% 26.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 20.9
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 710 595 56 332 81 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1079
Write 788
Mixed 721
SusWrite 312
162% 725 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 65.6
231% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 340
266% 363 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 151%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 17.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA Builds (Compare 727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_K513EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback