HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 22:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 388
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 435
MSI(1462 3400) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 25.20.14016.3003
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 7.9
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 7.9
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,355
Write 586
Mixed 499
178% 814 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 72
250% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 698
548% 761 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69% Good
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 105
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback