HP h8-1513c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1513c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory18.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 20:29
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 158
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 381
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.9% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 33.5
25% 29.5 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 22.5
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 55 55 60 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.1% Below average
Read 214
Write 69
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 57
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 16.5
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 44.6
56% 102 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 73%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
80GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 415 412 404 393 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 395
Mixed 420
SusWrite 404
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 37.8
121% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 358
267% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
324GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 97 95 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 103
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 96
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 112%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 64 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 80
Write 81.2
Mixed 66
SusWrite 62.4
98% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 49%
WD Game Drive 5TB
1TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 98 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 95.7
Write 85
Mixed 61
SusWrite 96.8
114% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 029E CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1513c Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1513c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $496
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback