Acer Aspire C27-1655

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire C27-1655  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire C27-1655
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210702
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 19:28
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 286
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 670
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 150F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1330
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 24.4
17% 23.6 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 1.3
12% 16 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1014 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 503 433 432 434 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1671
Write 1,694
Mixed 1,442
SusWrite 509
298% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 48.4
212% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 977
759% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 210%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston ACR32D4S2S1KC-4 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire C27-1655 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire C27-1655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback