Asus P5G41-M LX2/GB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5G41-M LX2/GB  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 87.9
40% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 90.7
12% 91.1 Pts
64-Core 89.1
6% 89.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Asus(1043 836D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GS120 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 209 212 156 182 208 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 235
Write 212
Mixed 188
SusWrite 196
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 13.3
84% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 15.9
24% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 77%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 17 18 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 19.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 19.2
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.7
199% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41-M LX2/GB Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41-M LX2/GB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback