Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 20%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS G41T-CM3  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 102
46% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 101
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 99.6
6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Elitegroup(1019 2206) 799MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.8
1% 1 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 75 63 27 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 64.2
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 60.6
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 7.3 7.2 7.9 7.2 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 12.7
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 7.6
18% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41T-CM3 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

Motherboard: ECS G41T-CM3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback