Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook W65KJ1_KK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '17 at 15:44
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 428
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 651A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8792
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 31.9
29% 31.6 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 24.4
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$76
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 479
Write 209
Mixed 244
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 3.18
60% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 0.02
43% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 68%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
714GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 125
Mixed 127
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M428020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 22.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback