Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Athlon(tm) Dual Core 4450e 26 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 39.2 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 44.3 24% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 51.3 8-Core 47.4 7% 49.3 Pts	64-Core 54.7 3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR054 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.9 2.3 2.6 18 176 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 219 Write 158 Mixed 191 SusWrite 34.4 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 3.7 50% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 69.7 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 1.2 22% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.54% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.8 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.54% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
64 Dual Core 6000+AthlonBench 42%, 6 samples	2x
Dual Core 4450eAthlon(tm)Bench 34%, 26 samples	2x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 9200NvidiaBench 1%, 1,231 samples	4x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	2x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	2x
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	1x
Sata III 240GBIntensoBench 75%, 1,213 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16