Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	10.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Athlon(tm) Dual Core 4450e 26 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 23.5 1-Core 16 2-Core 25.7 14% 21.7 Pts	4-Core 29.2 8-Core 34.5 4% 31.9 Pts	64-Core 32.2 2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.7 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 10.1 14% 14.2 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 17.7 Splatting 15.8 12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB 1,213 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0510E SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 42 52 70 71 70 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.7% Very poor	Read 63.3 Write 62.3 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 59.8 15% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 4.9 14% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.17% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 296 14% 296 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
64 Dual Core 6000+AthlonBench 42%, 6 samples	2x
Dual Core 4450eAthlon(tm)Bench 34%, 26 samples	2x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 9200NvidiaBench 1%, 1,231 samples	4x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	2x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	2x
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	1x
Sata III 240GBIntensoBench 75%, 1,213 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16