Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 58% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Positivo CI581128TBSEFI (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo NB50TH
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190816
Uptime	21.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '22 at 23:22
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	58%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 42 2-Core 105 51% 79 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 298 32% 255 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 55A1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.65% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 39 Parallax 7.6 0% 15.6 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 6 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.65% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SM280128GMMCL6B-S114212 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM21.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 110 10 90 9.8 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 229 Write 95.9 Mixed 124 SusWrite 46.9 27% 124 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 8.4 52% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 86.1 85% 133 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 77%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 392GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 89 94 93 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 125 Write 134 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 93.5 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS Kingston KF2666C15S4/8G 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 22 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 21 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CI581128TBSEFI Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	13x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	10x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	6x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	5x

SSD
CL1-8D128 128GBNvmeBench 104%, 82 samples	11x
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	3x
1TB SSD 1TBXraydiskBench 120%, 1,450 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	13x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 80%, 683 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16