Mechrevo X1 Series GI5KN4A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMechrevo X1 Series GI5KN4A  (all builds)
MotherboardMECHREVO X1 Series GI5KN4A
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180113
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 14:34
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 206
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 580
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 103C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 7.88
6% 13.5 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 15.2
9% 9.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM280128GMMCL6B-S114212 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 383 397 236 222 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77% Very good
Read 392
Write 355
Mixed 290
SusWrite 283
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 22.8
110% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 155
145% 221 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
885GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 34 33 42 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 44.5
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 40.5
31% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 72%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
371GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 7 8.1 6.3 6.3 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Read 6
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.6
8% 5.83 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X1 Series GI5KN4A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Mechrevo X1 Series GI5KN4A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback