Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Memory 25.3 1-Core 5.4 2-Core 10.6 11% 13.8 Pts	4-Core 29.6 8-Core 33.7 4% 31.7 Pts	64-Core 49.4 3% 49.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 18CD) 1,024MB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk SDW32G 31GB 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.3% Very poor	Read 149 Write 38.5 Mixed 72.6 19% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.64 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 3.6 20% 5.74 MB/s

Generic SL64G SD Card 63GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 56GB free Firmware: 3.0 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 6.96 Mixed 8.04 7% 8.77 MB/s	4K Read 4.38 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 1 303% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.8 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 284 14% 284 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16