Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 353
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 162 138 142 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 330
Write 185
Mixed 231
SusWrite 150
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 34.5
116% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 184
147% 205 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
213GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 237 234 87 90 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.1% Good
Read 258
Write 236
Mixed 236
SusWrite 162
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 25.7
103% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 49.1
77% 146 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback