HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory7.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 11:06
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5504
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 99.6
48% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 192
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.6
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.7
28% 35 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 23 24 133 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 207
Write 164
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 93.2
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 7.8
43% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 68
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 19.5
20% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 102%
OOS1000G 1TB
856GB free
Firmware: BE53
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 108 119 118 118 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 83
Write 85
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 112
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56%
Great: 110%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: 14244514
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 96 108 111 110 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 111
Write 107
Mixed 62
SusWrite 102
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST500VM000-1SD101 500GB
277GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 122 142 146 142 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 123
Write 138
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 132
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73%
Great: 100%
Generic Ultra HS-COMBO 64GB
51GB free, PID 2240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 14 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 17.6
Write 16.9
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 16.3
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
173% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:85 F7 F6451U67F9333G ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 46GB
1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback