HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive5.22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory6.4 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 19:07
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5504
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 93.1
44% 70 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 162
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 42
30% 39.5 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 27.2
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 53 69 51 64 71 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
5.22% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 21.2
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 57.8
6% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
3% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 102%
OOS1000G 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: BE53
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 91.4
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 102
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST500VM000-1SD101 500GB
267GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 96 97 98 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70% Good
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 93.9
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70%
Great: 100%
Generic Ultra HS-COMBO 64GB
59GB free, PID 2240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 18.4
Write 17.2
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 17.8
24% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.4
158% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:85 F7 F6451U67F9333G ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 46GB
1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback