Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 00:33
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,124
101% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,567
97% 1,567 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.4% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 64.1
37% 57.7 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 42.4
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 5.9 2.3 5.9 32 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 408
Write 296
Mixed 304
SusWrite 72.9
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 19.1
59% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 61.3
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 43.9
39% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 55%
Hua722010cla330 00W1143 00W1447IBM 1TB
149GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3PH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 80
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 129
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 29.7
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback